The Legal Examiner Affiliate Network The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner search instagram avvo phone envelope checkmark mail-reply spinner error close The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner
Skip to main content

The medical journal, PEDIATRICS, is featuring an article entitled What Pediatricians Should Know About Child-Related Malpractice Payments in the United States.

The purpose of this study was to examine child-related National Practitioner Data Bank data.

[During] the period from February 1, 2004, through December 31, 2005, a total of 30195 malpractice payments were made on behalf of practitioners in the United States; 14% of those payments (4107 of 30195 payments) were child related.

The average child-related malpractice payment was significantly greater than an adult-related malpractice payment ($422,000 vs $247,000).

Failure to diagnose was the leading reason for child-related payments (18%), followed by improper performance (9%), delay in diagnosis (9%), and improper management (6%).

I thought the article was doing its best to inform doctors and the public about the medical errors that injure or kill children. Then I read the conclusion.

CONCLUSION. Practicing pediatricians should be aware of the existence of a mandatory electronic depository that documents all malpractice settlements and judgments involving practitioners.

Is this really what pediatricians should know about child-related malpractice payments in the United States?

The medical journal, PEDIATRICS, is featuring an article entitled What Pediatricians Should Know About Child-Related Malpractice Payments in the United States.

The purpose of this study was to examine child-related National Practitioner Data Bank data.

[During] the period from February 1, 2004, through December 31, 2005, a total of 30195 malpractice payments were made on behalf of practitioners in the United States; 14% of those payments (4107 of 30195 payments) were child related.

The average child-related malpractice payment was significantly greater than an adult-related malpractice payment ($422,000 vs $247,000).

Failure to diagnose was the leading reason for child-related payments (18%), followed by improper performance (9%), delay in diagnosis (9%), and improper management (6%).

I thought the article was doing its best to inform doctors and the public about the medical errors that injure or kill children. Then I read the conclusion.

CONCLUSION. Practicing pediatricians should be aware of the existence of a mandatory electronic depository that documents all malpractice settlements and judgments involving practitioners.

Is this really what pediatricians should know about child-related malpractice payments in the United States?

Comments for this article are closed.